|Other titles||TransCanada Pipelines Limited|
|LC Classifications||HE199.5.G3 C36 2004|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||ix, 75 p. :|
|Number of Pages||75|
|LC Control Number||2005412260|
part of this Decision or the Reasons, to which readers are referred for the detailed text and tables.) The Applications By application dated 9 June , as amended on 17 September , TransCanada PipeLines Limited ("TransCanada") applied for new facilities to expand the capacity of its pipeline system in. IN THE MATTER OF an application dated 6 June by TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada or the Applicant): a) pursuant to subsection 21(1) of Part I of the Act for review and variance of the NEB RH Decision and Order TG/TO dated 16 March to allow for the determination of a fair. Reasons for Decision TransCanada PipeLines Limited RH Phase II. National Energy Board Reasons for Decision In the Matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited Mainline Tolls and Tariff Application RH Phase II Book value The amount at . Author of Excavation and construction near pipelines, Reasons for decision, Northern pipelines, Reasons for decision in the matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Reasons for decision, National Energy Board, Natural gas market assessment, Non .
Reasons for Decision RH National Energy Board Reasons for Decision In the Matter of Trans Québec & Maritimes Pipelines Inc. Cost of Capital for and RH March Permission to Reproduce TransCanada TransCanada PipeLines Limited. The decision is expected to cost the pipeline giant C$1 billion (US$ million). "TransCanada was forced to make the difficult decision to abandon its project, following years of hard work and millions of dollars in investment," the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, an industry group, said in a statement to Bloomberg. "The loss of this major project means the loss of thousands . National Energy Board, Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Application for approval of new receipt point at Gros Cacouna, Quebec for the receipt of regasified natural gas and the toll methodology that will apply to . TransCanada PipeLines Limited TransCanada Tower Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 () Michael L. Hermsen Mayer Brown LLP 71 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois U.S.A., () Ross A. Bentley Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP - 2nd Street S.W. Suite , Bankers Hall East Tower Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Court’s Calgary Stores Block Decision, Reasons for Decision on Motion by the ATCO Utilities dated Octo , Application No. , Proceeding ID No. 20, Novem 2 Decision , page 3 ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board),  A.J. No. , ABCA File Size: 1MB. National Energy Board Reasons for Decision In the Matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited; A.S. Hollingworth Independent Petroleum Association of Canada TransCanada PipeLines Limited Application dated 4 July , as amended, for Tolls RH; A.S. Hollingworth Independent Petroleum Association of Canada. The Keystone Pipeline System is an oil pipeline system in Canada and the United States, commissioned in and now owned solely by TC Energy. It runs from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in Alberta to refineries in Illinois and Texas, and also to oil tank farms and an oil pipeline distribution center in Cushing, Oklahoma. The pipeline became well known when a Country: Canada, United States. The Project was proposed by TransCanada Pipelines Limited and Phoenix Energy Holdings Limited ("TransCanada"). The ABQB noted that this judicial review was novel. ACFN sought to quash the ACO Decision that the duty to consult was not triggered, but did not ask for the matter to be returned to the ACO for reconsideration, nor did it challenge.